Case Results

Our firm helps individuals navigate the complex waters of Title IX violation allegations. If you are facing accusations, you deserve the support of a firm that has a track record of success and proven results. Read about our recent case results below to learn why Parisi, Coan & Saccocio, PLLC is qualified to represent you. Past results do not and cannot predict or guarantee a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.

  • Not Responsible
    2 Counts of Sexual Assault
    Our Client was charged with non-consensual sexual activity with the complainant, including penetrative sex. The complainant indicated that some aspects of the sexual encounter were consensual, but that the other portions of the encounter, including ...
  • Not Responsible for all 3 Charges
    2 Counts of Sexual Assault, 1 Count of Invasion of Sexual Privacy
    Our client was charged with engaging in non-consensual activity with the complainant, including penetrative sex. The complainant claimed that she was unable to consent to the sexual encounters due to her alleged incapacitation by alcohol ...
  • Not Responsible
    Dating Violence, Sexual Assault
    Client and complainant had a past dating relationship. After the relationship had ended complainant claimed that she had been subjected to unwanted and non-consensual sexual activity and episodes of dating/relationship violence. Client denied any ...
  • Not Responsible
    Dating Violence, Sexual Harassment
    Client and complainant had a modest past dating history. After the relationship ended complainant claimed that an incident of physical violence had occurred and that past incidences of sexual harassment had occurred. Client denied the alleged ...
  • Outcome: Not Responsible
    Discrimination and Retaliation based on Sexual Orientation
    Client was an administrative staff member in a supervisory role. Complainant claimed that Client discriminated against them by commenting upon Complainant’s sexual orientation, by performing an improper and discriminatory probationary evaluation and ...
  • Outcome: Not Responsible
    Failure to Report Incident of Sexual Misconduct by a Responsible Employee
    Client was a faculty member at a large state university and was a mandatory reporter for claimed allegations of sexual misconduct and domestic violence. Client was alleged to have failed to discharge their duties to report an incident of potential ...
  • Not responsible to all charges
    Multiple allegations of sexual assault and sexual exploitation
    Our client and the complainant had been involved in an informal relationship, which consisted of occasional sexual encounters. After a falling out between the two parties, the complainant filed several charges against our client, including ...
  • Not Responsible
    Other Inappropriate Sexual Conduct
    Client was charged with a broad alleged policy violation of “Other Inappropriate Sexual Conduct” based upon alleged sexual comments the client made to the complainant. Client strongly denied making any sexual comments to the complainant. Client ...
  • Outcome: Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client and Complainant were engaged in a short duration intimate relationship. After the relationship ended Complainant alleged that one of their sexual encounters was non-consensual and involved forcible sexual penetration. Client strongly denied ...
  • Outcome: Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client and Complainant met each other on a dating app. At their first in-person meeting, which occurred in a public setting, Complainant alleged that Client inappropriately groped them. Client denied the allegation and produced video evidence of the ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client was charged with non-consensual sexual activity with the complainant, including penetrative sex. Complainant, who had been in a sexual relationship with the client, indicated that one of their sexual encounters, which included penetrative sex, ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client was alleged to have sexually assaulted the complainant. The complainant’s allegation alleged that a penetrative sexual encounter occurred at a time when she was incapacitated by alcohol intoxication and over her explicit denial of consent to ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client was charged with non-consensual sexual intercourse with the complainant. Complainant claimed that she was heavily intoxicated and thus unable to consent to the sexual activity due to her alleged incapacitation. Client described the complainant ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client was charged with non-consensual sexual activity with the complainant, including penetration. Complainant claimed that she did not provide consent to certain aspects of the encounter, including the more serious sexual activity. Client described ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client was charged with engaging in non-consensual sexual activity with the complainant. Complainant claimed that while she was heavily intoxicated the client subjected her to unwanted and non-consensual sexual touching. Client denied that the ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client was accused of engaging in non-consensual sexual activity with the complainant. Complainant claimed that none of the sexual activity was desired and that there was no consent provided. Client denied that there was any sexual encounter at all. ...
  • Not responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Our client and the complainant were in an informal relationship that included occasional sexual encounters. When our client had expressed a lack of interest in entering an official romantic relationship with the complainant, he was later charged with ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client was charged with non-consensual sexual activity with the complainant, including penetrative sex. Complainant indicated that the sexual encounter, including the penetrative sex, was not consensual. Complainant also indicated that she was ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client was charged with engaging in non-consensual sexual intercourse with the complainant. Complainant claimed that neither verbal nor non-verbal consent to the encounter was obtained. Complainant claimed that during the encounter she was “frozen” ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client was charged with engaging in non-consensual sexual intercourse with the complainant. Complainant claimed that she was incapacitated by marijuana consumption and was unable to consent to the sexual activity. Complainant also claimed that she ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault
    Client was charged with non-consensual sexual intercourse with the complainant. Complainant claimed that he was heavily intoxicated and thus unable to consent to the sexual activity due to his incapacitation. Client denied that the sexual intercourse ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault (2 counts)
    Client was charged with sexual assault – penetration and sexual assault – contact, both with aggravating circumstances, by the complainant. Complainant alleged that she was rendered incapacitated by the client and thereafter subjected to sexual ...
  • Not Responsible as to both charges
    Sexual Assault (2 counts)
    Client was charged with two counts of sexual assault by the Complainant. Complainant alleged that she was subjected to unwanted, forcible sexual contact, including penetrative sexual intercourse, on two separate occasions. Client denied that any ...
  • Outcome: Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault (2 counts) and Sexual Harassment
    Client was charged with non-consensual sexual activity with the Complainant, including 2 acts of alleged forcible penetrative sex. Client was also charged with sexual harassment based upon the allegations. Client strongly denied that the sexual ...
  • Resolved via Informal Resolution with no finding
    Sexual Assault (2 counts) and Sexual Harassment (2 counts)
    In this consolidated investigation the client was charged with two counts of sexual assault and two counts of sexual harassment by two complainants (one of each charge for each complainant). Complainants alleged that they were subjected to unwanted, ...
  • Not Responsible as to all three charges
    Sexual Assault (3 counts)
    Client was charged with three counts of sexual assault. The allegations included sexual assault by force, lack of affirmative consent, and lack of consent due to incapacitation. Complainant claimed she was incapacitated due to alcohol and marijuana ...
  • Outcome: Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault (multiple counts)
    Client was charged with multiple incidents of forcible rape and sexual assault-fondling. Complainant alleged that Client engaged in multiple incidents of forcible intercourse and subjected the Complainant to unwanted sexual touching. Client strongly ...
  • Not Responsible for all three charges
    Sexual Assault (two counts), Sexual Harassment
    Client was charged with engaging in non-consensual sexual activity with the complainant (multiple episodes), including penetrative sex (one episode). Complainant, who was the former girlfriend of the client, claimed that she was subjected to unwanted ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault, Dating Violence, Stalking, Sexual Exploitation, Sexual Harassment
    Client was charged with multiple incidents of serious sexual misconduct. The Complainant and Client were former intimate partners in a relationship of moderate duration. The relationship was highly dysfunctional and characterized by frequent ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Assault, Sexual Harassment
    Client was charged with non-consensual sexual intercourse with the complainant and with sexual harassment based upon the content of text message exchanges. Complainant alleged that she did not agree to the intercourse, either verbally or ...
  • Not Responsible for Either Charge
    Sexual Assault, Sexual Harassment
    Our client was charged with sexual assault and sexual harassment by the complainant. The complainant alleged that she was subjected to unwanted, forcible sexual contact, as well as being subjected to the unwanted sexualized conversation and other ...
  • Not Responsible to all three charges
    Sexual Assault, Stalking
    Client and complainant had a dating history. Client was charged with engaging in non-consensual sexual intercourse (2 counts) with the complainant and stalking. Complainant claimed that one of the episodes of non-consensual sexual intercourse ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Harassment
    Client was alleged to have committed hostile environment sexual harassment by a subordinate employee. The allegations included multiple alleged instances of harassing comments, both verbally and via text messages, efforts to pursue a romantic ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Harassment
    Client was charged with engaging in verbal conduct of a sexual nature with the complainant. Complainant claimed that the alleged verbal conduct was unwanted, offensive, and distressing. Client described the verbal interaction as non-offensive ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Harassment
    Our client was employed by a university and was alleged to have engaged in a course of conduct that led to a hostile environment due to sexual harassment against a fellow employee. The allegations included multiple alleged instances of harassing ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Harassment
    Our client was employed by a university and was alleged to have engaged in a course of conduct involving hostile sexual harassment against a co-employee. The allegation alleged that over a brief interval of time, the client repeatedly sought to ...
  • Outcome: Not Responsible
    Sexual Harassment – Quid Pro Quo
    Client was charged with quid pro quo sexual harassment. Client was a faculty member who supervised a student employee. Client denied any act of sexual harassment and any quid pro quo. Client presented evidence that established the true nature of the ...
  • Outcome: Not Responsible
    Sexual Harassment – Quid Pro Quo, Sexual Harassment- Hostile Environment, and Unprofessional or Inappropriate Conduct of a Sexual Nature
    Complainant and Client were co-workers in a university program. Complainant alleged that Client subjected them to unwanted sexualized conversation and that Client engaged in quid pro quo sexual harassment and other professionally inappropriate ...
  • Complaint Dismissed
    Sexual Harassment, Gender Based Harassment, Hostile Environment Harassment (based on protected characteristics)
    Client was charged with Sexual Harassment and other forms of harassing behavior based upon Gender and other protected characteristics involving 2 individual Complainants in this consolidated complaint. One Complainant alleged that Client engaged ...
  • Outcome: Not Responsible
    Sexual Harassment-Hostile Environment
    Client was a staff member in a mentor/mentee relationship with the Complainant who was also a student employee. Complainant alleged improper conduct on the part of the Client, including highly sexualized conversation, improper touching, and unwanted ...
  • Not Responsible
    Sexual Misconduct
    Our client was alleged to have engaged in sexual misconduct involving alleged unwanted sexual behavior towards the complainant in violation of the Code of Student Conduct. Our client denied that any unwanted sexual conduct occurred between the two ...
  • Not responsible to all charges
    Six counts of sexual assault and one count of dating violence
    After ending a dating relationship with the complainant, our client was charged with five counts of sexual assault by non-consensual sexual contacts, one count of sexual assault by non-consensual sexual intercourse, and dating violence. The ...
  • Not Responsible
    Stalking
    Client was alleged to have engaged in stalking behavior against a fellow student. The allegation alleged that over a brief interval of time that client monitored the Complainant’s location, followed the Complainant, and engaged in other unwanted and ...
  • Not Responsible
    Stalking
    Client was charged with Stalking by the Complainant. Complainant alleged that she had a short-term relationship with the Client. Complainant alleged that after she communicated to Client that she wished him to cease contacting her that he persisted ...
  • Not Responsible to both charges
    Stalking, Dating Misconduct
    Client was alleged to have engaged in stalking and dating misconduct towards another student. The allegations included multiple alleged instances of harassing comments, efforts to pursue a romantic relationship, monitoring, unwanted communication, ...